Synopsis of discussion
Adding a Scholastic Section to regular MCC events
Prepared by Alan Hodge
As of 03-31-00
1. Expected attendance: Peter Lee estimates up to 20. There are
30-40 kids in his Wednesday group. We should also make Jefferson Woods aware of
it; he has a program in another school. Also there are other kids out there,
such as the Karman boys, who have played at the club before and might be
attracted back by the "early evening" time control. We could
advertise in other schools and through people known to have contacts (e.g.,
Larry Eldridge, Derek Slater). Given this pool, 20 seems to be a reasonable
prediction for turnout.
2. Trial: We organize and advertise tournaments for June, July and
August. (Need to determine when school closes and opens to determine start and
end dates.) If June and July are "successful," then we should
consider extending into September, also as a trial, to determine whether it is
feasible to hold this event during the school year. (Perhaps only during alternate
or selected months? But that's fodder for future discussion.) See alternative
suggestion at end.
3. Start time: 7:30 The advantages of this are four: (1) Common
registration process. (Also allows me to continue helping with registration as
I have in the past, which eliminates the "drain on volunteers"
issue.) (2) Noise issue minimized for kids and adults if events begin at the
same time. (3) Allows kids and parents to attend the study group. (4) Allows
people in scholastic section to call in for byes on same basis as players in
regular event. An earlier start time would mean an earlier deadline for call in
byes, which means double duty picking up phone messages for byes. An earlier
start time interferes with all of the above. A later start time gains us
nothing but causes a later end time, which is contrary to our objectives.
4. Separate room: The kids should play in a separate room to
minimize disruption and crowding in the main room. Using the skittles room is a
good solution, since setting it up for the scholastic section also sets it up
for adult skittles, and few adult games will be completed before the scholastic
section ends.
5. TD presence: I would expect to be the usual TD for the scholastic
section. This means I am in the room with the scholastics once their round
begins. If I am not playing in the regular event, this is not an issue. If I
am, I suggest that we solicit and encourage the cooperation of my opponent to
play in the room with the scholastics (with the normal, long time control, of
course). I wouldn't think that we would need to enforce this with a policy, but
we might be prepared for that just in case. The alternative, if my opponent
objects to playing in the room with scholastics, is that I would take a bye,
causing someone else to be paired out (because generally I don't play in the
regular event unless I am needed to even up the pairings.)
6. Coverage for me: While I expect to attend regularly, I know I
will miss one to three Tuesdays this summer around July 4th. Peter Lee or Tony
Gavelis are logical choices to back me up (a propos Mike Barry's question), but
I don't know of their availability. Also I don't know whether either is a
certified TD. So the club must be prepared to address this issue. (Kappy will
also be out during this period for the US Open.) (See also alternative
suggestion at end, which eliminates the problem at least for July 4.)
7. Entry fee: I suggest $10 per event (one event per month) for
non-MCC members, $5 for MCC members. I would be happy with $5 for everyone. I assume
USCF membership will be required, which will add some cost for the parents.
Regular entry fees should not be charged: see prizes. (See also alternative
suggestion at end.)
8. Prizes: No cash prizes. Trophies should be awarded to some number
of players (tbd) at the end of the summer reflecting participation for all
three events. A modified "POTY" scheme might work: .5 point for a bye
(absence), 1 point for playing (and losing), 1.5 for a draw or paired-out bye,
2 for a win. Trophies awarded based on total point accumulation for the summer.
9. Clocks: The current number of club clocks (and possibly sets)
might be inadequate to support the scholastic section, since some are regularly
used in the main event and I suspect few scholastic players will own clocks.
The club might therefore need to purchase additional clocks. (Should we
purchase now-standard digital clocks and use the older analog clocks for the
scholastics?) Whatever of the scholastic entry fees that is left after
purchasing trophies should be used to defray the cost of additional club
equipment. We should also confirm with Peter what equipment he could contribute
(lend) for the scholastic to use.
10. Time control: I like the G/30 option best
for these reasons. Peter's kids have only 30 minutes total to play a game, and
most of them are done well before the half hour is over. Giving most of these
kids a time control longer than G/30 will have absolutely zero impact on the
length of their games. Also, G/30 gets the round over at 8:30 or so, which is
positive, especially for the younger kids. Finally, if playing time is limited
to an hour, it increases the odds that some kids (and their parents) will
attend the study group; whereas a longer time control (perceived as longer
games even if kids don't actually play any longer) might discourage study group
attendance out of consideration for the entire time spent at the club. G/30
lets families invest two hours and do both the study group and a game. G/45 is
the next best option obviously, but I think it is unnecessary (additional time
unlikely to be used) and contrary to our objectives (early end time, study
group attendance). Anything over G/45 should not be considered.
Given that the proposed
range is K-9, another alternative might be possible. Depending on attendance
(numbers and age distribution) we could attempt two sections, with the time
control for the older kids being longer, but I would reserve this for a
mid-program adjustment if participation justifies it.
Finally, it is a reasonable
expectation that "serious" players who want (and would take some
advantage of) a longer time control (such as Nik Konovalchuk) are likely to
play in the regular ("adult") event in any case.
11. Rules and Conduct: Standard club rules and
policies would apply, with the particular addition that parents would not be
allowed in the room with the scholastics while games are going on. Forfeit
policy would be as normal, both with respect to calling the club to notify of
absences and with respect to penalties. Standard rules and etiquette would
apply, i.e., touch-move, dispute resolution, although I suggest that we should
encourage kids to announce check (to avoid illegal move claims against players
who might not recognize check unannounced). (Other opinions?)
12. Communication: The most pertinent rules and
conduct standards should be written up and not only given to every parent but
also reviewed before the beginning of the first round (and selectively in later
rounds as appropriate). Rules and standards regarding byes, forfeits, calling
the club, touch-move, recording results, and determination of trophy winners
should definitely be written up. (Other particular points?)
13. Parents games: Arrangements can be made for
parents to play recreational or rated games among themselves (not in the
scholastics room) with the scholastic time control. There would be no charge
for these games.